Angry backbenchers accuse Blair of double standards over Middle East
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Middle East
Sharon snubs new calls for retreat resolve
Eight killed by suicide bomber from refugee camp
Hizbollah steps up attacks on northern border
Monk shot in besieged Basilica of the Nativity
Jenin: 'Soldier shot my mother in the head'
Powell to increase pressure on Sharon
Netanyahu insists military action must go on
Angry backbenchers accuse Blair of double standards
Donald Macintyre: The PM and his party are not enjoying their Pinteresque dialogue
Simon Carr: What Blair lacked in certainty he certainly made up for in banality
David Horovitz: This is why the Israelis support Mr Sharon's tactics
Tony Blair failed to calm Labour MPs' fears over possible military action against Iraq yesterday as he faced one of the most hostile Prime Minister's Question Times since he came to office.
Mr Blair came under fire from three former ministers in the Commons hours after backbenchers questioned him at a meeting of the Parliamentary Labour Party.
The MPs' anger spilt over despite an announcement by the Prime Minister of new proposals to install British and European Union officials to monitor any ceasefire between the Israelis and Palestinians.
Mr Blair made clear that a new United Nations security council resolution, based on a Saudi peace plan for the region, would be sought in New York as early as next week.
He also promised MPs a debate on the Middle East on Tuesday and pledged for the first time that a similar debate would be held on Iraq if any decision was made on military action in the future.
But Peter Kilfoyle, a former defence minister, led the criticism at question time with a searing attack on Mr Blair's comments that critics of his foreign policy were "utterly naive". Mr Kilfoyle asked: "Is it naive to be dismayed at the succour which has been given to Sharon by the mixed messages which have come out of the American and British administrations?
"Is it naive to beware the bellicosity of elements within the American administration based on ideology or is it naive to believe in the centrality of the UN in resolving the problems of the Middle East?"
Jon Owen Jones, Labour MP for Cardiff Central and a former Welsh Office minister, said it was vital to tackle both the Middle East conflict and the Iraq situation without being seen to use "double standards".
George Howarth, a former Home Office minister, said he wanted an assurance that Saddam Hussein would be given every chance to comply with UN resolutions before any action was taken.
The MPs' comments reflected serious concern at Mr Blair's support for possible US military intervention when he met President George Bush in Texas at the weekend. Some 146 MPs, most from the Labour Party, have signed a Commons early day motion expressing "deep unease" at such support.
Mr Blair said Saddam's weapons of mass destruction programmme "has to be confronted and will be confronted".
Labour backbenchers' concerns were underlined when Mr Blair faced extensive questioning over his policy towards Iraq at a meeting of the PLP.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments