Andy Burnham falls short of full apology to campaigner
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Culture Secretary, Andy Burnham, has moved to defuse his damaging "smears" row with the civil liberties campaigner Shami Chakrabarti, but stopped short of saying sorry.
In a letter to the Liberty director he insisted that he had not set out to cause offence when he claimed she shared "late-night, hand-wringing, heart-melting phone calls" with David Davis, the former shadow home secretary who resigned to launch a public debate on civil liberties.
On Thursday, Ms Chakrabarti threatened to sue Mr Burnham, demanded a written apology and accused him of debasing his office with the comments, made in an interview with the Labour think-tank magazine Progress.
Mr Burnham sent a letter to Ms Chakrabarti yesterday, saying: "I have been genuinely taken aback at an interpretation placed on my remarks by others that I did not intend."
Ms Chakrabarti replied: "I am grateful for Mr Burnham's letter, which seems to show genuine regret for the distress his remarks caused me and my family. These remarks coincided with a relentless campaign of Westminster gossip that could only distract from serious issues and discourage young women from entering public life."
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments