Andrew Marr attacks 'genuinely tortured, angry individual' Jeremy Paxman following 'aggressive' leaders interviews
The political journalist made clear he is not a fan of the former Newsnight presenter's abrasive style of inquisition
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Andrew Marr has criticised Jeremy Paxman’s “aggressive” conduct during the Battle for Number 10 interviews with Ed Miliband and David Cameron last week.
Speaking to the London School of Economics at the Polis Journalism Conference, the BBC political host said that the separate examination of the leaders during the Channel 4 programme was “not a good replacement” for a head-on debate between the pair.
“I thought, I mean... the thing about Jeremy is that he is a genuinely tortured, angry individual - and you get the real Jeremy,” The Times quotes him as saying.
“He looks disdainful and contemptuous and furious with his guests because he by and large is. You can’t fake these things on television.
“But there is a danger for all of us, as it were, in the interviewer’s chair, to forget that we are not the ones standing for election. And I thought Ed Miliband did score [on Thursday] when he said: ‘Jeremy, you’re important, you’re not that important’.”
Marr went on to say he thought viewers would have been “surprised by how well Ed did versus David Cameron”.
“He wouldn’t have had to be brilliant. He wouldn’t have had to do very well. But there would have been a perception, and that would have started to change things and the dynamic of the campaign.
“And I was sure that’s what Ed Miliband thought as well, which is why he was so desperate for that to take place. David Cameron, ditto, desperate for it not to take place.”
He concluded that he has “never believed” that the correct approach to a political interview would be to treat the interviewee like a “scoundrel” or a “liar”.
“We don’t have to be this kind of really, really aggressive opposition all of the time,” he said.
Last week, Paxman faced a grilling of his own by reporters outside the Sky studios ahead of the election special broadcast. They questioned whether the former Newsnight presenter could truly be considered party neutral, after it emerged he had been approached to run as a Tory MP.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments