Dominic Raab says Pentagon leaks blaming Britain for Kabul airport bomb attack ‘just not true’
UK did not push to keep key airport gate open, foreign secretary insists
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.UK officials did not push to their US counterparts to keep a gate open at Kabul airport before the deadly bomb attack in the area, foreign secretary Dominic Raab has said.
American forces decided to keep the gate open longer than they wanted to allow British officials to continue evacuating personnel, according to leaked claims from the Pentagon.
But Mr Raab said it was “just not true” to suggest the UK called for the airport’s Abbey Gate to be left open for part of its exit operation, which then contributed to the suicide bombing attack by an offshoot of the so-called Islamic State.
The foreign secretary told Sky News: “It is certainly right to say we got our civilians out of the processing centre by Abbey Gate, but it is just not true to suggest that other than securing our civilians inside the airport that we were pushing to leave the gate open.”
He added: “In fact, and let me just be clear about this, we were issuing changes of travel advice before the bomb attack took place and saying to people in the crowd … that certainly UK nationals and anyone else should leave because of the risk.”
The so-called Islamic State’s Afghan offshoot, Isis-K, carried out the attack on Kabul airport on Thursday which killed two Britons and the child of a British national, along with 13 US service personnel and scores of Afghans.
The terrorist attack in Afghanistan has led to a transatlantic blame game, with US sources indicating the gate that was attacked was kept open to facilitate the British evacuation.
According to leaked Pentagon notes obtained by Politico, Rear Admiral Peter Vasely, commander of US forces in Afghanistan, had wanted to close Abbey Gate but said it was kept open to allow UK evacuees inside.
Asked if he thought the US briefing from the Pentagon was correct, Mr Raab told LBC: “I don’t recognise it as accurate,” adding that the British operation “wouldn’t have required leaving any gates open”.
No 10 also moved to reject the allegations surfacing in the US. Boris Johnson’s official spokesman said: “It’s simply not true to suggest that we pushed to keep the gate open.”
Former Tory leader Sir Iain Duncan Smith blamed Joe Biden’s administration for the terror attack at Kabul airport. “President Biden was responsible for those decisions which, I believe, were critical in the course of the events that we’ve seen unfolding,” he told LBC.
The influential MP added: “I do think now to attempt to try and brief against the UK on the suicide bombing is reprehensible really, because … if the American government or the American military were very serious about shutting the gates, they would have shut the gates.”
The final US troops left Kabul on a flight shortly before midnight local time on Monday, meeting US president Joe Biden’s commitment to withdraw ahead of the deadline.
Mr Raab added he had an “excellent working relationship” with the US secretary of state Antony Blinken – pointing to last night’s UN Security Council resolution, which calls on the Taliban to offer safe passage, humanitarian access and respect for human rights.
The foreign secretary also defended the US after a weekend drone strike targeted at a vehicle “carrying Isis fighters” reportedly killed 10 civilians. Mr Raab said the moral responsibility for civilian casualties caused by drone strikes “lies with the terrorists” .
The minister told Times Radio: “The right of self-defence is ultimately for every country to decide, but we do support exercising it and of course it has got to be targeted in accordance with international law, and the aim of the Americans was to hit a terrorist.”
He added: “And we know history shows – recent history in particular – that terrorists will try to hide in cover where civilians are at risk. I think the moral responsibility of that lies with the terrorists.”
Mr Raab also said the UK will “reserve the right” to take part in air strikes in Afghanistan in the future in the interests of “self-defence”.
It comes as the head of the Royal Air Force (RAF) indicated that British forces are still prepared to launch air strikes to target so-called Islamic State terrorists in Afghanistan. “If there’s an opportunity for us to contribute I am in no doubt that we will be ready to,” said Air Chief Marshal Sir Mike Wigston.
Meanwhile, Mr Raab denied claims in The Sunday Times he did not take regular calls from Afghan and Pakistani ministers during the evacuation from Kabul airport, allegedly because he thought Afghanistan was “yesterday’s war”.
The cabinet minister said that anyone “toddling off” to give “buck-passing briefings either at me or the FCDO is frankly not credible and it is deeply irresponsible”.
However, he was unable to name any time before the last few weeks in which he had spoken to ministers from either Pakistan or Afghanistan. He told LBC: “I can’t tell you my precise call sheet for the last six months.”
But he said he was part of a “team of ministers” and delegated phone calls to colleagues, including Foreign Office minister Lord Ahmad, who had led the UK’s relationship with the Afghan government.
The foreign secretary also insisted that there were “real, tangible” gains from the UK’s military action in Afghanistan over the last 20 years. “We have got to look at the gains that we made because of the sacrifice of so many.”
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments