Absent peers are whipped into line
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Before they got their peerages, Labour's new Lords were made to promise they would stick to a tough regime of long debates and late-night votes.
Before they got their peerages, Labour's new Lords were made to promise they would stick to a tough regime of long debates and late-night votes.
Party leaders have been shocked by the appalling record of some working peers, who, it is said, "like accolades but not the hours" and often miss important votes.
Each of Labour's 20 new Lords, appointed last week, was grilled by Lord Carter, the government chief whip in the upper house, to ensure no one thought to "take the peerage and run". All were told that they should spend at least three evenings a week in the House for late-night, three-line whip votes. They will even be assigned "mentors" to make sure they do not slip into the bad habits of their colleagues.
Labour has discovered that more than half the life peers appointed by Tony Blair - including some high-profile names - have missed a third of votes. But many Conservative peers are also poor attendees. A fifth of life peers of all parties turn up to the Lords only on one day a week, or even less often.
The worst Labour absentees, reportedly, include Lord Haskins, chairman of Northern Foods, who donated money to the Labour party - who had turned up twice in one five- month period. Lord Hollick, the chief executive of United News and Media, the owner of the Express, and Lord Bragg, were also poor attendees, both missing many votes.
Labour particularly hopes the new peers, along with nine Liberal Democrats, will tip the balance in the debate on Section 28 of the Local Government Act when it returns to the Lords. Labour only lost the last vote on it by a margin of 15. However, in the last Section 28 vote only 113 of Labour's 181 peers voted, causing some dismay among Labour's whips in the Lords.
Labour intends to put in place up to 25 further peers. But even then it will not have a majority in the Lords; at present it has 202 peers, the Conservatives have 236, Liberal Democrats 63, cross-benchers 161, bishops 26 and others 11.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments