Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

A new age of Blair emerges at the touch of a button

Steve Connor
Wednesday 22 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE YEAR is 2005 and after a second term as prime minister, Tony Blair's Bambi youthfulness is looking a touch frayed - the hair a little thinner, face fuller and skin more wrinkled, writes Steve Connor.

But this is no ordinary artist's impression of the ravages of time. The image of an ageing Mr Blair comes from a computerised database compiled by scientists at St Andrew's University. They believe it is the first entirely automated method of making a face grow old. David Perrett, a psychologist who helped develop the technique, said its great advantage over artists' impressions of the ageing process is that it can be used by untrained people: 'A person need not know how a face can change with age. You just need to press a button.'

The computer images rely on a database of about 600 people in two age categories: 20 to 30 and 50 to 60. It analyses features that change between the two groups and works out the difference, which can then be added to a picture to 'age' a person by a given number of years.

Duncan Rowland, a research assistant to Dr Perrett, said that after further refining of the process it should be possible to eliminate the bias and subjectivity inevitable in a picture enhanced by an artist. 'There is no artistic licence used in our method whereas 10 different artists could age a face 10 different ways.'

(Photographs omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in