Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Plan to `streamline' industrial tribunals

Barrie Clement
Thursday 15 December 1994 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Ministers yesterday published plans to speed up the increasingly overburdened industrial tribunal system, including increased powers to dismiss ``hopeless cases''.

Ministers did not take the radical option of introducing a charge for bringing unfair dismissal cases, but bowed to European pressure with a Bill to ``tidy up'' employees' rights.

In a Green Paper, Resolving Employment Rights Disputes - Options for Reform, the Government is seeking to cut the £27m cost of the procedures and ensure that more disputes between employer and employee are settled ``in house'' or by Acas.

As a deterrent to bringing cases, tribunals would award costs where an applicant ``unreasonably refused'' an employer's offer of compensation that was larger than the tribunal's own award. The ``streamlined'' courts could be renamed employment tribunals.Independent, binding arbitration would be offered as an alternative to a hearing and the legally trained chairman would sit alone except in cases involving discrimination or unfair dismissal. Unions last night said they were wary of ``legal eagles'' sitting without the advice of laymen with industrial experience.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in