Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lord Chancellor will look ‘extremely carefully’ at Pitchfork decision

The Parole Board has ruled double child killer Colin Pitchfork can be released from prison subject to conditions.

Jacob Phillips
Thursday 15 June 2023 19:30 BST
The Lord Chancellor will look “extremely carefully” into whether double child killer Colin Pitchfork can be released from prison, the Ministry of Justice has said (Police handout/PA)
The Lord Chancellor will look “extremely carefully” into whether double child killer Colin Pitchfork can be released from prison, the Ministry of Justice has said (Police handout/PA) (PA Media)

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

The Lord Chancellor will look “extremely carefully” into whether double child killer Colin Pitchfork can be released from prison, the Ministry of Justice has said.

The Parole Board has ruled that Pitchfork, jailed for life for raping and strangling 15-year-olds Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth in Leicestershire in 1983 and 1986, can be freed.

He was given a minimum term of 30 years in 1988, later had it reduced to 28 years for good behaviour and was released in September 2021.

He was back behind bars two months later for breaching the licence conditions of his release.

A Ministry of Justice source said: “Pitchfork was recalled to prison less than two years ago for concerning behaviour.

“That the Parole Board think he’s now safe for release is extremely worrying.

“This will do nothing for public confidence and will only strengthen calls for reform.”

Alberto Costa, South Leicestershire MP, said he is “deeply disappointed” by the decision to release Pitchfork and will be writing to Justice Secretary Alex Chalk to ask for an urgent review.

He tweeted: “It is simply unthinkable that a man who committed such egregious crimes should ever be released, and I will be asking the Government to challenge this decision in the strongest possible terms.

“It is quite clear to many, not only in South Leicestershire, but the country that this man still presents a very real danger to the public and I will do all I can to challenge this decision.

“My thoughts remain with the families of Lynda and Dawn at this most difficult time.”

Downing Street declined to “pre-empt” the Lord Chancellor’s consideration of the Parole Board’s decision.

A No 10 spokesman said: “The Prime Minister’s thoughts and sympathies remain with the families of Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth.

“In terms of the process, though, Colin Pitchfork won’t be released immediately.

“The decision is provisional for 21 days to give the Lord Chancellor an opportunity to apply for reconsideration and he will of course be looking at that very carefully.”

A Parole Board panel said Pitchfork’s behaviour for almost all his time in prison has not caused any concern and it is no longer necessary for him to be locked up for the public’s safety.

This will be a very upsetting decision for the families of Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth and our heartfelt sympathies remain with them

Ministry of Justice

A report said: “He has made constructive use of his time and is now 63 years old. In general, age tends to reduce risk.

“Mr Pitchfork has completed many courses satisfactorily and the evidence before the panel demonstrated that he had learnt the lessons that he had been taught and had worked out how to apply them in practice.”

Pitchfork was recalled to prison for approaching a lone female while litter picking, the report said.

But there was no evidence to support allegations he was pretending to collect litter, the Parole Board ruled.

The panel said the decision to recall him to custody was flawed and “made on the basis of some of the allegations not being proved and upon some incorrect information”.

A Ministry of Justice spokesperson said: “This will be a very upsetting decision for the families of Lynda Mann and Dawn Ashworth and our heartfelt sympathies remain with them.

“Pitchfork will remain in prison while the Lord Chancellor looks extremely carefully at whether to ask the Parole Board to reconsider its decision.

“Our number one priority is public protection which is why we are reforming the parole system and introducing a ministerial check to keep the most dangerous offenders behind bars.”

The Parole Board said Pitchfork can be released subject to several conditions, including complying with a requirement to live at a designated address and behave well, surrender his passport, attend supervision appointments and disclose any developing relationships.

He must also submit to enhanced supervision, including GPS tagging and a curfew, and comply with an unspecified exclusion zone to avoid contact with victims, women and children.

A Parole Board spokesperson said: “Having considered all of the evidence, during a hearing observed by the victims and the local Member of Parliament, the panel found that Mr Pitchfork’s recall to custody was flawed and not supported by the evidence.

“Separately, the panel found that the prisoner’s continued detention was no longer necessary for the protection of the public.

This case is eligible for reconsideration if any party thinks the decision is irrational or unfair

Parole Board

“Parole reviews are undertaken thoroughly and with extreme care.

“Protecting the public is our number one priority, however our sole focus in law is risk, not punishment, and must be based on evidence.

“This case is eligible for reconsideration if any party thinks the decision is irrational or unfair.”

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in