Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pit safety sabotage confirmed

Barrie Clement
Monday 27 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

BRITISH COAL is being urged to introduce independent checks on dust concentrations underground after it was found that equipment was sabotaged to allow production to continue in potentially harmful conditions, writes Barrie Clement.

A report by the Health and Safety Executive's Mines Inspectorate also concludes that there is no satisfactory explanation for certain critical discrepancies in official readings.

Relatively high dust concentrations were found in spot checks by British Coal's own research establishment and lower readings in routine samples at the collieries.

Union officials believe that incidents of malpractice in the Selby coalfield in North Yorkshire, revealed in the Independent last October and investigated by the inspectorate in the report, are probably the 'tip of the iceberg'. The Independent reported cases of pit personnel placing two filters, rather than one, in monitoring devices so lower concentrations were recorded.

British Coal said the report found no evidence to support allegations of widespread interference in dust- sampling devices. But Peter McNestry, general secretary of the pit supervisors' union Nacods, believes that some managers tamper with equipment. Consistently high dust readings can halt output and affect judgements about the viability of the mine.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in