Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Pharmacists 'fail to supervise staff who sell medicines'

Celia Hall
Wednesday 01 June 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

PHARMACISTS are failing to supervise their staff who are handing out restricted medicines incorrectly, according to a report published today, writes Celia Hall.

A Which? report says that one- third, nine out of 27 staff in pharmacists' shops in London, Newcastle, Kent and South Wales did not consult their pharmacist when they sold 'pharmacy-only' medicines.

In two cases, restricted medicines were sold, illegally, when the pharmacist was out of the shop. Even when assistants did check, they were only 'going through the motions'.

A total of 30 pharmacists were visited by Which? researchers who asked for pharmacy-only drugs. These include a number which have until recently been available on prescription only. In 27 shops out of 30 'no attempt was made to find out what the customer wanted the medicine for or to advise them on its use,' Which? says.

In 10 pharmacies, researchers, briefed on symptoms for thrush, simply asked for Canestan cream. In nine out of ten cases, they were sold the wrong type of Canestan, the one suitable for athlete's foot, not the cream for internal use.

Which? says the Royal Pharmaceutical Society's code of ethics does not define supervision of assistants clearly enough.

Increasingly powerful prescription drugs are being made available over the counter.

In 1993, 14 were added and another 10 become available in July. Last year people in Britain bought pounds 1.2bn worth of drugs in pharmacists' shops.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in