Pensioner who shot intruder escapes charge: Attorney General decides householder who opened fire acted in self-defence
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE Attorney General has decided not to prosecute a pensioner who shot an intruder in the knee at his cottage.
Tony Evans, 66, who had been burgled eight times before the incident, became a hero to local people and the popular press after confronting the intruder last month. He picked up his shotgun and told the man to surrender after finding him at his home in Pluckley, Kent, one afternoon. Instead, the intruder charged at him.
After firing his gun, Mr Evans kept the man covered, and dialled 999. Police arrived to find the man screaming on the floor, and questioned Mr Evans at length, telling him he could be charged with attempted murder.
No one had been arrested in connection with any of the previous break-ins.
But Sir Nicholas Lyell, the Attorney General, told the Commons: 'Any shooting incident must be carefully investigated. It is not for people to take the law into their own hands . . . there was a prompt review of the evidence by the Crown Prosecution Service, acting in close consultation with the police, which showed that Mr Evans had acted only in self defence.'
For there to be a reasonable chance of conviction, the prosecution would need evidence that Mr Evans had intended to attack the intruder, and had used undue force. There were no witnesses to the incident.
A relieved Mr Evans said yesterday: 'You must do what you do. It's difficult even looking back now to know if there was intent. He leapt at me. I squeezed the trigger, but it was more or less that he ran into the bullets. He was coming at me so fast. I pointed the gun and told him to surrender but he charged at me instead. I was only firing into the carpet.'
He said that the gun was not normally kept ready and loaded. 'I had got rid of all the rabbits, so I had not used it for a year. Then two rabbits came back. That morning I'd taken it out. I had meant to put it away, but I had gone out in a hurry.'
Mr Evans said that he accepted the police could not condone what he had done. 'They had to act. It could lead to a vicious circle if everyone starts arming themselves to shoot at burglars. The burglars may start arming themselves and then the police and before we know it we may be living in a gun society.
'I realise there are some gung- ho people around but I don't consider myself one of those. Lots of people sympathised with me. Some said no jury would convict me of any charge. But it was still a terrible anguish for me waiting to hear what was going to happen to me. I really feared going to jail.'
He said he regretted the shooting, adding: 'Since then I've thought of another way to defend myself if that sort of situation were to happen again.'
Police are still investigating the alleged break-in.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments