Pension Scandal: Troubled schemes kept fallen firm in public eye
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.ALTHOUGH Coloroll collapsed nearly four years ago, the company's pension schemes have kept the wallpaper and home-furnishing group in the public eye.
The Coloroll pension scheme has provided a landmark ruling from the European Union's Advocate General which clarifies the equalisation of pension rights between men and women. Pension equalisation threatened to cost British industry up to an estimated pounds 50bn. However, the Advocate General's ruling last year on the Coloroll case made it clear equalisation only applied to pension benefits earned after May 1990.
The problems covered by the Pensions Ombudsman's report disclosed today only relates to the small directors' pension scheme. This only has about 12 members and at its height is believed to have assets of about pounds 1.5m.
However, another Coloroll pension scheme is also in trouble. Former Coloroll employees who worked for a carpet-making subsidiary are believed to face a 30 per cent cut in their pension because of a pounds 3.2m deficit in their scheme. The deficit is partly blamed on a pensions contribution 'holiday' taken in early 1990.
Trustees are suing Noble Lowndes, the scheme's former actuaries, for substantial damages, claiming that the firm relied on misleading data when it allowed Coloroll to suspend contributions.
Noble Lowndes, which was bought last year from TSB Group by Sedgwick, the large insurance broker, has denied the allegation. The firm also acted as actuary to the directors' pension scheme. Coloroll had a total of 15 pension funds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments