A ‘high bar’ needs to be cleared before prime minister should be ousted – Scully
Boris Johnson has refused to say whether he would resign if found to have broken his own coronavirus laws.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.There should be a “high bar” to get rid of a sitting prime minister, a senior Tory said after Boris Johnson refused to say if he would quit if found to have broken coronavirus laws.
Business minister Paul Scully said he would need to “see the context” of any findings against Mr Johnson before making a decision on the Tory leader’s future.
His comments follow reports that at least two Cabinet ministers will withdraw support from the Prime Minister if he is issued with a fixed penalty notice for flouting the restrictions imposed by his Government.
The Prime Minister has completed a police questionnaire in relation to alleged parties held in Downing Street while England was under tough coronavirus restrictions.
In a major television interview on Sunday, he repeatedly refused to say whether he would quit if he broke the law.
On Sky News, Mr Scully said there should be a “real high bar to get rid of any prime minister”.
He said he would want to see the full findings of senior civil servant Sue Gray’s investigation into the partygate row, along with the outcome of the Metropolitan Police investigation, before making any decision on the Prime Minister’s future.
“I’m going to wait until I see context before I really make any more judgment on it,” he said.
But The Times reported that at least two members of Mr Johnson’s top ministerial team would turn against the Prime Minister if he was found to have broken the law.
Sources speaking on behalf of two unnamed members of the Cabinet said that Mr Johnson’s position would become untenable in those circumstances.
One of the sources told The Times: “If he gets an FPN he’ll have to go. How can you have a prime minister who has been found guilty of breaking the law?”
A minister and close ally of a second cabinet member said: “If the Met’s conclusion is effectively that he broke the regulations, then it makes his position extremely difficult.
“It’s going to be very difficult for him to stay, especially if it’s for a party in the No 10 flat.”
The Prime Minister will hope that scrapping England’s remaining coronavirus rules will help win back support from Tory MPs who have been at odds with him over the measures imposed to curb the spread of the virus.
But Andrew Bridgen, a prominent critic who has submitted a formal letter saying he has no confidence in Mr Johnson to the Tory backbench 1922 Committee, said ending the legal restrictions would not change his mind.
He told ITV’s Good Morning Britain: “The Prime Minister has done the right thing with regard to the Covid restrictions and that doesn’t change the status of my letter of no confidence.”