Sunak urged not to ‘railroad’ MPs into backing Windsor pact on Northern Ireland
The Commons European Scrutiny Committee urged the Prime Minister not to set any ‘unnecessary deadlines’ for the agreement to be put into action.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Rishi Sunak has been warned not to “railroad” MPs into accepting his new Brexit deal for Northern Ireland without giving them “meaningful input”.
The Commons European Scrutiny Committee urged the Prime Minister not to set any “unnecessary deadlines” for the Windsor pact to be put into action to allow scrutiny.
In the cross-party group’s report published on Tuesday, they said failure to do this before the plans are implemented could be “construed as giving rise to a fait accompli”.
Mr Sunak has promised MPs a vote on his new arrangements agreed with the EU but has not set a date as the Democratic Unionist Party (DUP) study the plans.
Parliament should not be railroaded into a deal that it has not had sufficient time to come to an educated choice over whether to proceed or renegotiate
The Commons committee urged Mr Sunak to avoid “artificial” deadlines by rejecting holding a meeting of the Withdrawal Agreement Joint Committee (WACJ) between London and Brussels that would approve the agreement this month.
“The House should have the opportunity for meaningful input into the shape of the deal, well in advance of sign off by the WAJC and without the threat of artificial Government or EU deadlines,” the report read.
The committee also expressed “disappointment” over Mr Sunak’s decision not to appear before the committee, citing “heavy diary commitments”.
Sir William Cash, the veteran Conservative who chairs the committee, added: “Parliament should not be railroaded into a deal that it has not had sufficient time to come to an educated choice over whether to proceed or renegotiate, which will be unlikely to happen if the Government were to rush ahead particularly if the EU wishes to do so.
“MPs in the House must have a meaningful chance at input before this happens.”
No 10 was unable to say when MPs will be given a vote on the agreement Mr Sunak approved with the EU’s Ursula von der Leyen on February 27.
“Parliament will have its say and we’ve confirmed there will be a vote on this,” a spokesman said.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.