Oxfam suspends pounds 2.21-a-call line
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.OXFAM confirmed yesterday that it had suspended a Rwanda crisis hotline for which it was paying pounds 2.21 per call, writes Tim Kelsey.
The charity defended the cost of the telephone service, which was not advertised to donors, stating that it would not otherwise have been able to cope with the volume of calls. The decision to axe it was taken some days ago and was not related to cost, it said.
Labour has called on the Government to investigate the cost to charities of obtaining credit-card donations. Charity commission guidelines allow private companies to charge to their costs up to 7 per cent of funds raised.
Oxfam said yesterday that it was being charged pounds 2.21 per caller by a telephone company, which administered donations following a campaign of Rwanda appeals on radio stations. A spokeswoman said that the cost reflected the expense of having calls answered live. Oxfam decided to contract-in the live service because of the volume of calls anticipated and the need for accuracy in recording donor details. Oxfam reckons about 30 per cent of callers to answering machines leave inaccurate information.
'A decision has now been taken to end that service, because the volume from that appeal is slowing up,' she said. 'We only use an outside answering service if there is a huge bulk of calls. We would not incur charges if we didn't know that the appeal income would justify it. If we tried to answer all the calls ourselves, many people would not get through.'
Other donor hotlines, which employ an automatic answering service, remain open and because they are administered by Oxfam do not incur a fee.
The spokeswoman said that the charity averages the costs of fund- raising across all its sources. 'In this case, overall appeal income costs 4p in the pounds 1 from credit-card donations. That's all. Nobody is paying more than that.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments