Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Suspended chief constable will not give evidence, misconduct panel hears

Nick Adderley’s barrister said his client would not be giving evidence ‘in light of legal advice given’.

Stephanie Wareham
Wednesday 29 May 2024 16:27 BST
Nick Adderley leaves Northampton Saints Stadium, Northampton, following the first day of his misconduct hearing on Tuesday (Jacob King/PA)
Nick Adderley leaves Northampton Saints Stadium, Northampton, following the first day of his misconduct hearing on Tuesday (Jacob King/PA) (PA Wire)

Your support helps us to tell the story

As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.

Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.

Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election

Head shot of Andrew Feinberg

Andrew Feinberg

White House Correspondent

The suspended chief constable at the centre of a misconduct hearing over claims he exaggerated his naval rank, length of service and achievements will not give evidence to the panel.

Nick Adderley, of Northamptonshire Police, who has been accused of “building military naval legend” including the implication that he served in the Falklands War despite being just 15 when the conflict happened in 1982, was due to speak on the second day of the three-day hearing in Northampton.

However, after a short meeting with his defence team on Wednesday afternoon, Mr Adderley’s barrister Matthew Holdcroft said his client had decided not to give evidence “in light of legal advice given” in relation to potential criminal proceedings.

Earlier in the day Mr Holdcroft had contended that the case against Mr Adderley, put forward by John Beggs KC on behalf of the Office of the Northamptonshire Police, Fire and Crime Commissioner, was built on “inference or innuendo and not investigation”.

The defence counsel had argued that some of the evidence that had been heard should be struck out but it was rejected by the legally qualified chair of the panel Callum Cowx.

With Mr Adderley no longer due to give evidence, closing arguments will be made on Thursday morning.

The hearing continues.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in