Nickell review to look at two issues
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE POLICE review of the Rachel Nickell case, announced on Sunday, is divided into two strands.
Det Chief Supt Bill Ilsley, who is new to the case, will spend the next month looking at all the evidence to see if anything was overlooked. Sir Paul Condon, Commissioner of the Metropolitan Police, said yesterday that Mr Ilsley will 'minutely examine all the evidence', and review the action taken in connection with the 500 suspects who were eliminated, as well as studying the 7,000 files and 1,300 witness statements.
A review based on bringing in someone new to the case is known as a Byford review, named after a former Chief of Constabulary, and it is the second time it has been employed in the Nickell case. The first was in November 1992 after which it was proposed to set up the undercover operation.
In the second strand of the review, begun immediately after the case against Colin Stagg collapsed last week, Assistant Commissioner Ian Johnston, in charge of crime policy in the Metropolitan Police, and officers under his personal supervision, are looking into the use of psychological profiling, police management of high-profile cases, undercover officers, and the interaction between the police and the Crown Prosecution Service.
The reviews come after a Mr Justice Ognall strongly criticised police methods in the Old Bailey trial of Mr Stagg. He described the use of an undercover policewoman to trap him into confessing to the murder on Wimbledon Common in July 1992 as 'a blatant attempt to incriminate the suspect by deceptive conduct of the grossest kind'.
Letters, page 11
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments