NHS should abolish raft of national targets, Patricia Hewitt review says
The former Labour health secretary was commissioned by the Government to examine the future of the health service.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The NHS should abolish a raft of national targets while shifting its focus towards preventing ill health, according to a review by a former Labour health secretary.
The study by Patricia Hewitt, commissioned by the Government and officially published on Tuesday, says a few targets help concentrate minds but having too many makes them less effective.
It comes as the NHS continues to miss major targets on A&E waits, ambulance response times and cancer waits and treatment times.
The review will say that adding new targets and initiatives and not being consistent with funding makes it impossible to plan new services and recruit staff, and wastes money and time.
Ms Hewitt will also say that some targets, such as those on A&E waits, leave less room for medics to use their clinical judgment.
An excessive focus on hitting targets by managers or NHS boards can lead to “gaming” of the targets and “disastrous neglect of patients themselves”, the review will say.
In her study, extracts of which have been seen by the PA news agency, Ms Hewitt will say ministers should consider significantly reducing the number of national targets, with no more than 10 national priorities.
There should also be more focus on outcomes to improve patient care.
Cutting waiting times for key surgery such as hip replacements and cataract operations should be matched by a focus on cutting waits for mental health treatment, Ms Hewitt will say.
Local leaders running new integrated care systems (ICSs) – which are partnerships of organisations that come together to plan and deliver joined-up health and care services – should be given more space and time to lead.
On preventing ill health, the review will call for the share of total NHS budgets at ICS level going towards prevention to be increased by at least 1% over the next five years.
The public health grant to local authorities should be increased after eight years of a real-terms squeeze on their funding.
This “shift upstream” towards preventative services is vital to prevent more older and increasingly unhealthy people entering hospitals that will never be large or efficient enough to cope, the review will say.
Ms Hewitt will say the NHS is, in practice, more of a national illness service than a national health service and will call for rapid change.
The Government should also consider creating Citizen Health Accounts carrying people’s health information and data, to help people manage their own health and care.
Further details will be set out on Tuesday.