Harrowing Covid-19 stories published by inquiry
Every Story Matters is still open for submissions across a variety of topics.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Harrowing stories from patients and NHS workers who experienced the Covid-19 pandemic have been published by the inquiry examining its impact.
More than 32,000 people have contributed to the Every Story Matters record, which is designed to assist UK Covid-19 Inquiry chairwoman Baroness Heather Hallett in reaching conclusions and making recommendations on how to handle future pandemics.
Monday marks the publication of the document, which is the result of the largest public engagement exercise ever undertaken by a UK public inquiry.
Every Story Matters is still open for submissions across a variety of topics.
The record covers the experiences of health professionals and patients across primary care and hospitals, as well as emergency and urgent care, end-of-life care, maternity, shielding, and long Covid.
It covers how some patients found accessing healthcare during the pandemic very difficult and stressful, how families faced significant challenges in supporting their loved ones at the end of life, and how health workers felt planning for the pandemic was poor and the speed of the response too slow.
The document also includes detail from 604 in-depth interviews carried out with those who were involved with healthcare.
UK Covid-19 Inquiry secretary Ben Connah said: āIn this, our first published record, we draw together thousands of experiences that demonstrate the impact of the pandemic on patients, their loved ones, healthcare systems and settings, and the people working within them.
āIt is a tough read in places ā but it really brings to life how people experienced our healthcare systems during those pandemic yearsā¦
āI would encourage everyone with a story to share it with us. To find our more visit everystorymatters.co.uk.ā
Some contributors to the record said senior medics made end-of-life decisions for patients, partly to spare their junior colleagues having to do it.
One said of young doctors: āThey were surrounded by people dying, more than one patient in a day, and often uncomfortable and looking distressed when they died.
āIf you donāt have that confidence, that certainty and itās all a bit new to you and youāre surrounded by chaos and suffering and death then I think itās much more stressful.ā
End-of-life care also frequently involved hospital staff being with dying patients when their loved ones could not.
āNobody wants anybody to die on their own, and as nurses you try really hard to make sure that that doesnāt happen,ā one hospital nurse said.
āIf family members canāt be there, youāre there. You just are. You just do it.ā
One healthcare assistant said they held a dying patientās hands as their family watched through a window.
Another worker said: āWeāre trying to get quality for families, and so, even if, you know, I can wake a patient up for two hours so they can have a chance to have a coherent conversation with their loved ones, thatās a win, because thatās precious.
āAnd, you know, if theyāre going to die, if we can make that passing as dignified and as not horrible as it can be, knowing itās going to be horrible, and if we can take just some of the edges off it, itās still going to be bad.ā
A hospital doctor spoke of having to tell a patient with a bowel perforation over the phone that they were going to die because they could not be offered an operation.
This was because the operation was moderately high risk and was assessed as riskier due to Covid-19.
āAt the time the evidence was suggesting that doing operations on people wasnāt particularly safe, particularly if they had Covid,ā they said.
āIt meant that people who in any other time would be offered an operation, an emergency operation to fix something catastrophically wrong with them such as bowel perforation, which normally we would go ahead with without thinking twice about, we offered far fewer of those operations.
āAnd, in doing so, knew that people were going to die as a result, and that was obviously very hard.ā
The document also showed how some medics believed the Nightingale hospitals set up to treat patients was a misuse of resources.
One said: āWe set up huge Nightingale hospitals with ICU (intensive care) capabilities which were under-used, likely due to lack of highly trained staff or ICU need.
āA bit of lateral thinking could have meant these being used for less intensive care such as care of the elderly, rehab beds or Covid+ intermediate care beds, freeing up hospital beds for patients that needed them.ā
Some NHS staff also told the inquiry how stressful it was to be redeployed from their usual role.
One physiotherapist said:Ā āWhen it came to being redeployed, we were actually redeployed as ICU nurses ā this had not been communicated to us prior to starting our shifts ā and all the jobs that that entails. We had no training ā as there were too many patients ā and were asked to do 12.5-hour shifts.
āWe undertook all of this willingly as we knew that this was a challenging time.ā