NHS chief attacks bleak prediction of future cost
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NICHOLAS TIMMINS
Public Policy Editor
Alan Langlands, the NHS chief executive, yesterday attacked the "gloom and doom" view that the NHS cannot be afforded and that both rationing and privatisation of the health service is inevitable.
In a straightforward rebuke to Sir Duncan Nichol, his predecessor, and Rodney Walker, the outgoing chair of the NHS Trust Federation, Mr Langlands said he wanted to "distance himself" from what he dubbed the "ration-and- privatise brigade".
Launching the NHS annual report, Mr Langlands said there would always be a gap between everything the NHS might wish to do and what was possible. Choices had to be made and setting priorities was "a fact of life".
But that reality was "neither new nor peculiar to the health service". He did not find the arguments in Sir Duncan's Healthcare 2000 report "terribly convincing", and accused Mr Walker of appearing to "talk up some sort of immediate crisis". The NHS was under "significant pressure", Mr Langlands said, but the service was coping, "with good ideas about changing the way things are done".
The pressures of an ageing population, medical advance and heightened expectations were not new, Mr Langlands said, "and the NHS has been responding to them successfully for many years".
Over the next five to 10 years, the population "is not ageing at a pace that we won't be able to cope" given the real terms growth the NHS has been promised. The numbers of people over 85 - whose care on average costs 10 times as much annually as those aged 16 to 44 - were set to rise from only 1.6 per cent of the population to 2.1 per cent between 1990 and 2000.
There were problems over expensive new drugs, but other advances such as minimally invasive surgery and the possible development of artificial bone saved money.
His comments came as Stephen Dorrell, the Secretary of State for Health, praised the Greater Glasgow Health Board for shifting its contracts for breast surgery to six named consultants whose results provided a 10 per cent better survival rate. It has also restricted treatment of testicular cancer to one hospital with and more successful treatment.
NHS Annual Report 1994/5. Free. Telephone 0800 555 777.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments