Muslims awarded 1000 pounds for race bias
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.First Edition
SEVENTEEN Asian workers disciplined for taking a day off to celebrate a religious festival were yesterday awarded 1,000 compensation each for racial discrimination.
The industrial tribunal hearing in Leeds, West Yorkshire, was regarded as a test case for the Asian community. The men had received final written warnings when they took a day off in June 1992 for Eid one of the most important dates in the Muslim calendar.
Keith Sugars, managing director of JH Walker, of Dewsbury, West Yorkshire, 'mutiny'.
The company had banned staff from taking holidays during its busiest period of the year in May, June and July. But the Asian workers did not believe the rule applied to Eid because they had always previously been given the day off for the festival.
Last November the tribunal decided that the men had been racially discriminated against. Yesterday's remedy hearing was to decide on compensation.
Fraser Younson, the company's solicitor, had urged the panel to award between 50 and 100 compensation. But Zafar Iqbal, who represented 16 of the men, said a low award might trivialise the matter.
He said after the award: 'That is the tribunal's decision and I am sure my clients are going to be happy with it. It was a matter of principle.'
The company is planning an appeal against the awards to the Employment Appeals Tribunal.
Mr Younson said: 'We are very surprised by the decisions today, to say the least. We feel the tribunal misdirected themselves on the question of intent.'
He told the hearing that the company had not intended racial discrimination against the men.
'The evidence is plain as a pikestaff that the company took its decision entirely for business reasons,' he said.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments