Gallacher quits as Scottish Tory deputy leader after Ross election claims
She said she was ‘deeply troubled’ by the reports and raised concerns for the party’s reputation.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Meghan Gallacher has resigned as the deputy leader of the Scottish Conservatives amid concerns the party’s leadership contest could be at risk following reports about the alleged conduct of Douglas Ross in relation to the General Election.
Ms Gallacher, who is one of six MSPs in the race to replace Mr Ross as leader, said she is unable to continue in her role due to the potential “reputation” risk to the party.
In a statement on social media site X, Ms Gallacher said she was “deeply troubled” by reports in the Telegraph that current leader Mr Ross allegedly asked Moray West, Nairn and Strathspey Tory candidate Kathleen Robertson if he could replace her in July 2023 – a claim he has denied.
Ms Gallacher’s intervention throws the leadership contest into turmoil after four of the other candidates – Murdo Fraser, Brian Whittle, Liam Kerr and Jamie Greene – wrote to the party to demand “serious questions” be answered over the allegations.
The leadership contenders said they need answers to allow the contest to “proceed”.
In her letter to Mr Ross, Ms Gallacher said: “I was completely unaware of discussions surrounding a candidate that took place in July 2023. Following the story being published, there is a potential risk to the reputation of our party and the leadership contest moving forward.”
She also said it was “regrettable” the leadership team had not contacted her in her position as deputy since the allegations came to light.
Ms Gallacher also cited her leadership candidacy as a reason for her resignation, stating there is a “conflict of interest” in remaining as deputy.
She told Mr Ross: “I will not be able to assist you as I have been excluded from doing broadcast and media on behalf of the party, as part of my candidacy.
“It is with great sadness that I tender my resignation as deputy leader.”
In a statement on X in response, Mr Ross said: “It is with regret that I accept your resignation as deputy leader.
“It has been a pleasure to work with you over the last two years to take the Scottish Conservative Party forward and challenge the SNP Government.”
He said he accepted her reasoning of “conflict of interest” concerns, and added: “I have committed to remaining neutral in this contest.”
Mr Ross is alleged in the Telegraph to have told Ms Robertson that his “heart was in Westminster, not Holyrood”, but it is claimed she refused the request to stand aside despite being promised selection as a Holyrood candidate in 2026.
The newspaper also reported Mr Ross told her he would prefer leadership candidate Russell Findlay to replace him.
A letter from Mr Fraser, Mr Whittle, Mr Kerr and Mr Greene said: “As candidates for the leadership of the Scottish Conservative and Unionist Party, we are deeply concerned by the disturbing claims reported today about the conduct of Douglas Ross in relation to his seeking candidacy for a number of seats in the recent General Election.
“The reports also reference his plans and preferences for a replacement leader to take over the party upon his departure which are relevant to the transparency and fairness of the current leadership contest we are participating in.
“These allegations raise serious questions for the party which, in our opinion, require to be answered before current leadership election proceeds further.”
Mr Ross previously ruled out standing at Westminster to focus on his Holyrood priorities as leader and Highlands and Islands MSP.
But he U-turned during the 2024 election, announcing he would seek election in the Aberdeenshire North and Moray East seat, facing further criticism after former MP David Duguid said he was “deselected” the night before the announcement due to ill health.
Mr Ross then announced he would step aside as party leader.
He lost the seat to the SNP on July 4 and now faces calls from the nationalists to resign from Holyrood.
Mr Ross told the Telegraph he sought the meeting with Ms Robertson at the request of local members to check she was “still committed to standing for the seat”.
He said: “She confirmed that she was and I then campaigned with her in the hope that she would win the new constituency.”
On the Telegraph claim that Mr Ross told Ms Robertson he wanted Mr Findlay to replace him as Holyrood leader, he told the newspaper: “Throughout the leadership election I have said absolutely nothing about the candidates or the contest, other than I will remain as leader until my successor is appointed. My decision to remain neutral throughout the contest will not change.”
Mr Findlay said: “I had no knowledge of any conversations that have been reported.
“I am standing to change our party and recent developments underline why change is so necessary.
“I am focused on running a positive campaign. I will continue to set out my vision to win over the public with common-sense, Conservative policy proposals that champion aspiration and opportunity.”
A Scottish Conservative spokesperson said: “This relates to a personal and private conversation between Douglas Ross and Kathleen Robertson and is not a matter for the party.
“Some months later, Kathleen Robertson separately informed the chairman and the party director about this meeting and said she wished this matter to remain confidential and required them to do nothing further.”
Ms Robertson has been asked for comment.