Moore centre 'would not be Disneyland'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.PLANS to build a pounds 4m visitors' centre in the grounds of Henry Moore's Hertfordshire home would not create 'a Disneyland with statues', a public inquiry was told yesterday, writes John Arlidge.
The Henry Moore Foundation, established in 1977, nine years before the sculptor's death, is appealing against a prior decision by East Hertfordshire District Council rejecting an application for planning permission.
The proposed development, for Dane Tree House at Perry Green, has soured relations between the foundation and Mary Moore, the artist's only child, who opposes the plan.
David Woolley QC, counsel for the foundation, told the inquiry in Much Hadham that if the enterprise was vetoed, most of the works of a figure 'unequalled' in 'the history of 20th-century art and civilisation' would remain 'in cupboards, locked up in strongrooms or in packing cases'.
Facilities for visitors were 'wholly inadequate'. The proposed buildings were not 'overpowering . . . those who imagine a sort of Disneyland or Alton Towers are fundamentally mistaken'.
Sir Alan Bowness, the foundation's director, dismissed claims by Nathalie Lieven, counsel for Miss Moore and Bruce Brodie, executors of the estate of Moore's wife Irina, that a planned observation tower would defeat Moore's aim that visitors should come upon sculptures by surprise.
The inquiry continues today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments