Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Mentally ill to get more help, NHS chief says: Cash promised to ease crisis in cities

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

EXTRA cash to deal with the crisis in mental illness services in London and other big cities is on the way, Alan Langlands, the chief executive of the National Health Service, indicated yesterday.

The money will come in the wake a string of scandals over the care of the severely mentally ill, and a warning last December from the Mental Health Act Commission that 'urgent action' was needed to tackle overcrowding, understaffing, suicides and a regime of 'minimal therapy' in inner-city mental illness units. The units were 'in crisis', the commission warned, with patients discharged too early to admit those who were even more disturbed.

Mr Langlands, speaking at the Institute of Health Services Management's annual conference in Bournemouth, said mental illness was 'very much top of the agenda', with a report following a detailed study in London about to go to ministers.

'There are lessons about targeting resources to those most in need, I am sure there are lessons about the need to beef up resources and particularly to cope better with acute admissions, and as always there are messages about handling people who travel or wander across the boundaries of various statutory agencies. All of that is in the pipeline.'

Although the study had looked at London, Mr Langlands said: 'I am sure that there's a read across, if not to the whole country, to most other big cities.'

He added later that it would be wrong to pre-empt the report's findings, but it was plain that there were important issues to tackle. These 'will require better targeted resources and probably in some cases more resources. We can achieve that in a whole number of different ways'.

One option would be to change the formula by which NHS cash is allocated to give mental illness greater weight. Other options included various specific grants or policy guidance telling health authorities to purchase more mental illness care. In a speech in which he emphasised the need to 'close the gap' between NHS policy and delivery on the ground, Mr Langlands said mental illness services were a good example of that.

'We have in place some very good, very clear policies . . . but we haven't been very good at implementing them.'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in