Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE LORD CHANCELLOR, Lord Mackay of Clashfern, is facing a second High Court challenge over his plans to restrict expenditure on legal aid, writes Adam Sage.
The Law Society said yesterday that it would seek a judicial review of the Government's proposals to curb eligibility for legal aid, arguing that Lord Mackay had exceeded his powers and had failed to consult properly.
As a result of his plans, due to come into force next week, the number of people receiving civil legal aid will fall by almost 30 per cent next year. The Law Society says this would undermine the 1988 Legal Aid Act, designed to help people 'who might otherwise be unable to obtain advice, assistance or representation'.
Mark Sheldon, its president, said: 'We have been left with no alternative but to take action through the courts to defend the legal aid scheme.' The society will also argue that Lord Mackay failed to fulfil a statutory duty to consult with lawyers and consumer organisations.
Lord Mackay says the cuts are a necessary part of the Government's programme to curb public expenditure. His legal aid budget is now more than pounds 1bn; without the restrictions on eligibility, it would have exceeded pounds 2bn within three years.
Last month, the Law Society won the right to a full hearing after claiming that Lord Mackay's scheme to replace hourly rates with standard fees would be illegal.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments