Mother of twins targeted by Lucy Letby ‘carries the sadness of other families’
The mother of Child E and Child F told the Thirlwall Inquiry she learnt the full details of both incidents at Letby’s criminal trial.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The mother of twin boys targeted by Lucy Letby said she “carries the sadness of other families” that the serial killer was not stopped earlier, a public inquiry has heard.
In August 2015, Letby, 34, assaulted Child E, which caused bleeding, and also injected air into his bloodstream, and nearly 24 hours later she poisoned Child F with insulin.
She went on to murder three babies and attempted to murder five more, until she was removed from the Countess of Chester Hospital’s neonatal unit in July 2016.
A doctor told the parents a post-mortem examination was not necessary for Child E, as it was thought he had died from a bowel condition which was common in premature babies, when in fact no sign of the condition was detected on a X-ray.
And they were informed that Child F’s deterioration was because of a catheter infection, and were unaware he had suffered an episode of hypoglycaemia and that blood tests had shown an abnormally high level of insulin.
We put our trust in these people. I put my trust in them to do the right thing and the best thing for my children
Giving evidence on Wednesday at the Thirlwall Inquiry, the mother of Child E and Child F said she learnt the full details of both incidents at Letby’s criminal trial.
She said: “It took us through our children’s lives essentially hour by hour, and to find out that Child E had that significant bleed to the point of it being very, very unusual, and for no post-mortem to be warranted from that, made me question why.
“Why was the post-mortem not mandatory? Why was it left to me to make that decision?
“I feel guilty for not requesting that, because if that had come back and something would have been on it, there is a lot of babies that could not have been involved in this case and it could have stopped there.
“That weighs very, very heavily on me and that decision was ultimately ours.
“That’s painful to think about so I carry our grief, but the sadness of the other families, because it should never have gone past that point.”
She went on: “And it’s the same when I realised that the insulin reading was there, and it was seen, and nothing was done.
“That could have been an end to this whole horrendously sad turn of events but it wasn’t.
“And I think although the doctors and consultants worked really hard to save Child E, there should have been some curiosity as to why he was bleeding.
“Why Child F’s insulin was not just a little bit over, it was in the 4000s? Why was it not investigated?
“We put our trust in these people. I put my trust in them to do the right thing and the best thing for my children.”
Inquiry chairwoman Lady Justice Thirlwall told her: “You have absolutely nothing to feel guilty about, nothing. You have nothing to blame yourself for, nothing at all.”
The doctor who advised Child E’s mother that a post-mortem examination would show no new information later apologised to her in the courtroom, as she gave evidence at the criminal trial.
Child E’s mother told the inquiry: “It was a really emotional moment because it was the first time that anyone from the Countess of Chester has apologised for their part in what happened, and I think it was extremely brave to do so.”
She said she first became aware of any investigation in February 2017, when the hospital’s medical director, Ian Harvey, wrote to inform them about an external review of a greater number of deaths than expected on the neonatal unit in 2015 and 2016.
She said: “I received that letter via a black taxi knocking on my door, about 30 minutes before that report was due to go live online on the hospital website.
“I was absolutely mortified.”
Her only previous contact from the hospital, she said, was when they rang twice to ask for the return of a breast pump, which she used at her son’s funeral, when she had in fact already returned it.
The inquiry has heard that families affected were provided with a redacted version of the Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health report which omitted details about concerns from consultants about “Nurse L”.
Child E and Child F’s mother told counsel to the inquiry, Rachel Langdale KC, she would have liked to have seen the full report at the time.
She said: “I think the Countess of Chester being transparent and open with what they were investigating would have given me peace of mind, not thinking I had missed something.
“I blamed myself for a lot of things that happened in that time. I don’t think it should have been held back. To do that, I think it’s quite hideous to be honest.”
She subsequently made numerous attempts by phone to set up an appointment with Mr Harvey, but he “hid behind his secretary”.
Asked what suspicions she had about Letby at the time, or since, she said Letby’s behaviour after the death of Child E was “very different” from other nurses.
She said: “She was very attentive of me. Whenever she used to see me she would hug me.
“She was just as upset as me which, reflecting back on it now, is very odd behaviour, when none of the other nurses were really like that.
“They were very professional and cared for Child F in the correct way, while she was really emotional. I thought she was being kind.
“She looked like every time she spoke to me she was on the verge of tears, very upset.”
She recalled that she and her husband took a hamper to the neonatal unit in October 2015, because “we were so grateful to have a child that was still with us.”
Child E and F’s mother told the inquiry: “I think I mistook people’s kindness. They seemed caring, they had our best interests at heart, and it turns out one person didn’t, and they betrayed everything and did the most unimaginable thing possible.
“For me, my children are not left with anybody. They don’t get left in any medical setting with anyone.
“The worst thing happened to us, it happened to us twice, it was not going to happen a third time. We protect those children with everything.
“I ask questions and I don’t take people at face value, and I think that was part of my naivety at the Countess of Chester.
“I took people at face value. I took what consultants said and I took what Lucy Letby said at face value and for what it was, but a lot of it was lies.”
We thought our daughter's brain injury was God's will. We couldn't do anything about it and we just had to accept it
The mother of Child G, who Letby attempted to murder twice, said the nurse had “ruined our lives”.
Letby targeted the baby girl by overfeeding her with milk and pushing air down her feeding tube on September 7 and September 21 2015.
Child G sustained severe brain damage and requires high levels of care and support, the inquiry heard.
In a statement read on behalf of Mother G, she said: “I feel Lucy Letby has ruined our lives. She has ruined everything.
“Our daughter needs 24-hour care because of Letby. We don’t know how long she will live. It affects every single minute of all our days.
“For years we thought our daughter had suffered from neonatal sepsis and aspirated her vomit, causing her brain damage and making (her) the way she is now.
“We only found out years later that the blood tests that had been done at the time showed no evidence our daughter was suffering from sepsis.
“We thought our daughter’s brain injury was God’s will. We couldn’t do anything about it and we just had to accept it.
“Our poor daughter, oh my God, our precious little fighter who didn’t have much chance being so premature. Then when she was doing well, Lucy Letby made her collapse and caused her brain injury.
“I feel that the Countess of Chester have covered up what happened to our daughter for years. To my mind, the Countess of Chester was more concerned about their reputation than about our daughter’s life.”
Reading his own statement, Child G’s father said he did not understand the sepsis diagnosis as her brain had been “developing well” and she had been “improving” at Wirral’s Arrowe Park Hospital before she was transferred to the Countess of Chester.
He said: “The doctors didn’t tell us on September 7 our baby daughter in fact had a projectile vomit with the milk coming out of her tiny little body with so much force that it reached the chairs opposite the cot.
“They also didn’t tell us that … upon then aspirating the contents of our daughter’s stomach they found 45ml of milk which was an enormous amount of milk and more than her feed.
“We only found this out at the criminal trial.
“Moreover they didn’t tell us that she stopped breathing twice on September 21.
“It came as a big shock.”
Letby, from Hereford, is serving 15 whole-life orders after she was convicted at Manchester Crown Court of murdering seven infants and attempting to murder seven others, with two attempts on one of her victims, between June 2015 and June 2016.
The inquiry is expected to sit until early 2025, with findings published by late autumn of that year.