Cabinet minister does not know ‘who knew what when’ over Louise Haigh
Ms Haigh resigned as transport secretary on Friday in relation to a criminal conviction.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A Cabinet minister has said he does not know “who knew what when” in relation to the criminal conviction which saw Louise Haigh quit as transport secretary.
Ms Haigh resigned on Friday after it emerged she had pleaded guilty to a criminal offence related to incorrectly telling police that a work mobile phone was stolen in 2013.
Chancellor of the Duchy of Lancaster Pat McFadden told Sky News he is “sorry to see” Ms Haigh go, describing her as a “good colleague”, and also said it is “not against the law” for somebody who has had a conviction to serve in Parliament.
Asked whether Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer knew the full story of her criminal conviction when Ms Haigh was appointed to the Cabinet, Mr McFadden told the Sunday Morning with Trevor Phillips programme: “I don’t know who knew what when.
“What I know is that she made the decision to resign. We’ve got a new appointment, Heidi Alexander, in place, and that will mean that we continue with the agenda we’ve got, which is bringing the railways back into public ownership … and a good transport agenda going forward.”
It’s not against the law for someone who’s had some kind of conviction in the past – a conviction that’s spent, as I understand it – to serve in Parliament
He added: “It’s not against the law for someone who’s had some kind of conviction in the past – a conviction that’s spent, as I understand it – to serve in Parliament.
“The decision of who serves in the Government is, of course, one for any prime minister, but it’s not against the law … for that to happen.”
On Friday, Downing Street declined to say whether the Prime Minister knew about Ms Haigh’s criminal conviction and added that “further information” had come to light before her resignation.
Sir Keir’s spokesman repeatedly told journalists on Friday that Ms Haigh’s resignation came after new information emerged.
“Following further information emerging, the Prime Minister has accepted Louise Haigh’s resignation,” the spokesman said.
He did not confirm whether Sir Keir had known about the conviction or specify what the new information was.
Asked if the PM believed Ms Haigh was completely candid when she was appointed to his Cabinet, the spokesman said he would not “get into individual conversations”.
He repeated that ministers are expected to adhere to the Ministerial Code, but did not say how the code applied to Ms Haigh’s resignation.