Sugar told ‘You’re fired’ as he is accused of treating Parliament with contempt
The tables were turned on the business tycoon, who has not spoken in the House of Lords for six years.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Apprentice star Lord Sugar was told “You’re fired” as he was accused of treating Parliament with “contempt” over his long-running failure to take part in proceedings.
The business tycoon was given a dose of his own boardroom medicine after being sworn in at Westminster, where he has not spoken in the upper chamber for six years.
It is understood the Amstrad founder only narrowly avoided being kicked out of the House for non-attendance by turning up on the last day of the previous parliamentary session.
Under the current rules, there are no requirements for participation beyond attendance for a peer to maintain their seat.
Many peers had already made the required pledge of allegiance at the despatch box ahead of the summer break, following the election and return of Parliament.
According to the parliamentary record, Lord Sugar’s last spoken contribution in the Lords was in October 2018.
It also shows the independent crossbencher has not voted since 2017 and has never asked a written question.
A participation requirement by members of the unelected chamber had been proposed by Labour as part of a package of Lords reforms in its election manifesto, alongside a mandatory retirement age of 80, and the removal of hereditary peers.
However, only the latter proposal is currently being taken forward in legislation.
He is one of the peers who treats the House with contempt
It was as Lord Sugar was being sworn in that Labour former minister Lord Foulkes of Cumnock turned the tables and, pointing across the floor of the chamber, shouted: “You’re fired!”
He later said of Lord Sugar: “He is one of the peers who treats the House with contempt.
“There is a growing feeling that we should tighten up the requirements, not just for attendance but also for participation, and kick out those who are not meeting a minimum of both.”
There have been ongoing concerns about the size of the Lords and calls to reduce its membership – which stands at around 800, compared with the 650 capped number of MPs.
Lord Sugar’s representatives have been contacted for comment.
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.