Lone-parent hostel plan condemned
Your support helps us to tell the story
As your White House correspondent, I ask the tough questions and seek the answers that matter.
Your support enables me to be in the room, pressing for transparency and accountability. Without your contributions, we wouldn't have the resources to challenge those in power.
Your donation makes it possible for us to keep doing this important work, keeping you informed every step of the way to the November election
Andrew Feinberg
White House Correspondent
PLANS to put single mothers into hostels and to force their parents to pay towards their upkeep were condemned yesterday as a return to Victorian morality, writes Rosie Waterhouse.
Conservative sources appeared to be floating the ideas to curb spending on lone parents as part of a drive to cut social security spending of pounds 80bn this year.
Peter Lilley, the Secretary of State for Social Security, is reported to be seriously considering proposals to encourage councils to build hostels for young single mothers, force them to provide a court order to prove they have been thrown out of their parents' home and to compel their parents to contribute towards their cost of living.
Anti-poverty campaigners claim Mr Lilley's assumption is not backed by the facts: that of 895,000 single parents on income support in 1991 only 45,000, or 5 per cent, were between 16 and 19. Sally Witcher, director of the Child Poverty Action Group, said: 'The idea of hostels for lone parents smacks of Victorian attitudes and their institutions for fallen women.'
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments