Man charged over headband worn at pro-Palestine rally in central London
Khaled Hajsaad, 24, is accused over the item of clothing worn at a demonstration in central London on November 25.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A young man has been charged with wearing a green headband with writing on it which is said to arouse “reasonable suspicion” he supports Hamas.
Khaled Hajsaad, 24, from Birmingham, is accused over the presence of the Islamic Shehada on the item of clothing worn at a pro-Palestine rally in central London on November 25.
He is said to have worn the clothing “in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that he is a supporter of a proscribed organisation, namely Hamas.”
The alleged offence is contrary to the Terrorism Act 2000.
Hajsaad will appear before Westminster Magistrates’ Court on Wednesday.
Nick Price, head of the Crown Prosecution Service’s special crime and counter terrorism division, said: “The charge follows an investigation by the Metropolitan Police’s Counter Terrorism Command.
“Criminal proceedings against this individual are active and he has the right to a fair trial.
“It is extremely important that there should be no reporting, commentary or sharing of information online which could in any way prejudice these proceedings.
“The function of the CPS is not to decide whether a person is guilty of a criminal offence, but to make fair, independent and objective assessments about whether it is appropriate to present charges for a criminal court to consider.”