Lilley to target poor families
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.LOW-INCOME families on housing benefit could be the next target under the Government's controversial review of the welfare state, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
Peter Lilley, Secretary of State for Social Security, is drawing up proposals aimed at encouraging claimants to move to cheaper accommodation in an attempt to contain the costs of the benefit, which will approach pounds 9bn in the current financial year.
Mr Lilley is understood to be examining a tentative suggestion for a system of regional maximum rents which could involve some families moving to cheaper homes to qualify for help with rent.
While local authority rent officers tend not to authorise payment of the benefit in luxury districts, there is no specific rental ceiling above which rents cannot be reimbursed. But a combination of a duty to reimburse 'reasonable rents' and the relaxation of rent controls have helped contribute to the soaring bill, which is reimbursed out of central funds.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments