Lee Anderson refuses to apologise for Sadiq Khan remarks
The ex-deputy Tory chair launched a fresh attack on the London Mayor after unleashing an Islamophobia row with earlier comments.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Lee Anderson has doubled down on his criticism of Sadiq Khan and refused to apologise for remarks that sparked an Islamophobia row, as Rishi Sunak came under pressure to call out his words as Islamophobic.
The former Tory deputy chairman on Monday admitted his original remarks were āclumsyā, but said saying sorry āwould be a sign of weaknessā.
It came after the Prime Minister broke his silence on the matter to denounce Mr Andersonās comments that cost him the Conservative whip as āwrongā.
The Ashfield MP was suspended over the weekend after he claimed āIslamistsā had āgot controlā of Mr Khan and London.
On Monday, Mr Anderson told GB News: āWhen you think you are right you should never apologise because to do so would be a sign of weakness.ā
In a statement to the channel, where he presents a weekly show, he said he had made comments āthat some people thought were divisiveā.
āPolitics is divisive and I am just incredibly frustrated about the abject failures of the Mayor of London, Sadiq Khan,ā Mr Anderson said.
āMy words may have been clumsy but my words were borne out of sheer frustration at what is happening to our beautiful capital city.ā
In a fresh attack on Mr Khan, the now-independent MP said: āHundreds of people had been arrested for racist abuse on these marches and we barely hear a peep from the mayor. If these marches were about something less fashionable, Sadiq Khan would have been the first to call for them to be cancelled. Itās double standards for political benefit.ā
Mr Sunak said Mr Anderson had been deprived of the Tory whip because his āchoice of words wasnāt acceptable, it was wrongā.
But he refused to describe the MPās comments as Islamophobic when pressed repeatedly, telling broadcasters in Yorkshire: āI think the most important thing is that the words were wrong, they were ill-judged, they were unacceptableā¦
āItās important that everybody, but particularly elected politicians, are careful with their words and do not inflame tensions.ā
Sir Keir Starmer said the Tory leader ālacks the backbone to call this out for what it isā.
Speaking to reporters in Shrewsbury, the Labour leader said: āI think this is straightforward. Itās Islamophobia and the Prime Minister should call it out for what it is.
āThe reason he wonāt is because he is so weak.ā
And Mr Khan said the Prime Ministerās refusal to call Mr Andersonās remarks Islamophobic āspeaks volumesā.
The Labour Mayor wrote in the Evening Standard: āIt shouldnāt be hard to call out comments that are so unambiguously ignorant, prejudiced and racist. Yet those at the top of the Conservative Government are stubbornly refusing to do so.
āItās a tacit endorsement of anti-Muslim hatred and can only lead to the conclusion that anti-Muslim bigotry and racism are not taken seriously.ā
The Prime Minister also declined to criticise former home secretary Suella Braverman, who claimed āthe Islamists, the extremists and the antisemites are in charge nowā.
āI think that those comments were not about an individual in particular,ā he said, adding that āitās important that we call outā the kind of āunacceptableā scenes āwe have been witnessing on our streets in recent timesā.
Asked whether his party has an Islamophobia problem, Mr Sunak told local BBC radio stations in the morning: āNo, of course it doesnātā.
Amid a wider spat in the party about language used, West Midlands mayor Andy Street lambasted fellow Conservative Paul Scully for claiming that a part of Birmingham with a large Muslim community was a āno-go areaā.
āThe idea that Birmingham has a āno-goā zone is news to me, and I suspect the good people of Sparkhill,ā Mr Street said on X, formerly Twitter.
āIt really is time for those in Westminster to stop the nonsense slurs and experience the real world.ā
No 10 said Mr Sunak did not agree with Mr Scullyās assessment.
Asked whether the Prime Minister concurred that there are āno-goā areas in Birmingham, his official spokesman said: āNo, and the PM has talked before about the value of the very diverse communities and societies that we have in the UK.ā
A Conservative party source had defended Mr Andersonās comments on Friday night, before he was stripped of party support on Saturday amid mounting condemnation from across the political divide.
Mr Anderson, a standard bearer for the Tory right, will now sit as an independent unless he defects to another party that chooses to offer him its backing.
Reform UK leader Richard Tice did not rule out opening the door to Mr Anderson after his suspension.
āLee Anderson may have been clumsy in his precise choice of words, but his sentiments are supported by millions of British citizens, including myself,ā he said in a statement.
āI do not and will not give a running commentary on any discussions I have with any MPs, but those MPs have my number.ā
We have always been clear that this Government does not and will not tolerate anti-Muslim hatred
Mr Andersonās comments have put a spotlight on the ongoing dispute over the classification of Islamophobia.
Downing Street reiterated the Governmentās position of refusing to back the all-party parliamentary group on British Muslimsā 2019 definition.
The Prime Ministerās official spokesman told reporters: āAs the Government has stated previously, there are issues in relation to the APPGās definition of Islamophobia, which conflates race with religion, does not address sectarianism within Islam, and may unintentionally undermine freedom of speech.
āBut as Iāve said, we have always been clear that this Government does not and will not tolerate anti-Muslim hatred.ā
Tory peer Baroness Warsi criticised Business Secretary Kemi Badenoch after she said the definition supported by Labour and the Liberal Democrats ācreates a blasphemy law via the back door if adoptedā.
āThis is absolute nonsense Kemi,ā Baroness Warsi, who was a cabinet minister in Lord David Cameronās government, tweeted.
āThe government has dragged its heels on any work to tackle this form of racismā¦
āNo new initiatives, no engagement with communities, no definition. Instead culture wars, othering and blatant anti-Muslim racism.ā