Leading Tory sues newspaper over Nadir
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE director-general of the Conservative Party is suing the Guardian newspaper for libel over an article about the handling of donations by the fugitive tycoon, Asil Nadir, to party funds.
Paul Judge alleges that the article, published in September, falsely implied that staff at Conservative Central Office - for which he is responsible - in Smith Square, central London, had resorted to 'dirty tricks' in order to obstruct inquiries by trustees acting for Nadir's creditors about donations made by him or his companies.
The front-page article reported that investigators thought their efforts to obtain precise details of Nadir's transactions with the party, to see if any monies could be reclaimed, had been obstructed. It also said the trustees were threatening court action.
The article reported that solicitors had 'been reduced to delivering copies of letters by hand to Mr Judge at Smith Square, with accompanying notes saying: 'We hope this does not get lost between the front office and your desk' '.
In a writ, issued earlier this week, Mr Judge is seeking damages for libel and an injuction restraining the Guardian from publishing similar claims.
He claims that his character and reputation have been seriously damaged by the article, and that he has suffered considerable distress, anxiety and embarrassment.
The Guardian is expected to contest the libel action.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments