Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Lawyers call for end to murder-charge time limit

Chris Blackhurst
Tuesday 12 July 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE RULE prohibiting an attacker being charged with murder if the victim dies more than a year and a day after the assault, should be abolished, according to an official report published today, writes Chris Blackhurst.

A consultation paper from the Law Commission advocates scrapping the 400-year-old rule entirely with no time limit for murder or manslaughter charges.

The move has been prompted by a series of recent cases where victims have been kept alive on life support machines with the result that their assailants have been prosecuted for less serious offences and escaped with lighter sentences.

One of the best known cases involved Michael Gibson, a teenager who was badly beaten up in the street in Darlington in an unprovoked attack in April 1992. Mr Gibson never recovered consciousness but did not die until August 1993 - 16 months later - and his attacker received a two year prison sentence for causing grievous bodily harm.

Stephen Silber QC, a member of the Law Commission said yesterday: 'An armed robber can be prosecuted many years afterwards so why not a murderer?'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in