Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Law Report: Sisters succeed in assault claims: P and others v K - Queen's Bench Division (Sir Gervase Sheldon, sitting as a High Court judge), 11 November 1993

Ying Hui Tan,Barrister
Friday 12 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Three sisters were awarded damages for physical and indecent assaults by their father during their childhood and adolescence.

Sir Gervase Sheldon gave judgment for three plaintiffs against their father, K. The plaintiffs, three sisters now aged 28, 25 and 24, claimed damages against their father for physical and indecent assault, aggravated in some cases by sexual intercourse and buggery inflicted in their childhood and adolescence. The allegations included frequent beatings by cane and belt and sexual abuse. The plaintiffs claimed damages for pain and mental suffering and for future medical treatment, such as counselling. The father denied the allegations.

Howard Shaw (Thomson Snell & Passmore) for the plaintiffs; Karen Rea (Wainwright & Cummins) for the father.

SIR GERVASE SHELDON said that the plaintiffs had proved their case beyond all reasonable doubt and succeeded in their claims. The plaintiffs had given truthful and accurate accounts. It was difficult to believe a thing the father said. Each would be allowed pounds 3,500 to cover future medical treatment. General damages of pounds 13,000, pounds 8,000 and pounds 7,000 would be awarded respectively.

Ying Hui Tan, Barrister

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in