Lamont urged to close tax loophole
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A LABOUR member of the Treasury select committee, the Inland Revenue watchdog, yesterday tabled a Commons question critical of John Birt's tax-avoiding steps, writes Patricia Wynn Davies.
Brian Sedgemore, Labour MP for Hackney South & Shoreditch, urged Norman Lamont to close the tax loophole, asking whether he had 'any plans to clarify the definition of 'employee' in relation to PAYE in connection with the payment of fees through private companies in lieu of salary'.
Mr Sedgemore said: 'John Birt heads an organisation which receives pounds 1bn a year from the licence fee, which is basically a tax. Clearly he cannot go on arguing for the retention of the licence fee if he is not going to pay his share.' He added: 'It is impossible to see how Mr Birt is classified as self-employed when manifestly he is an employee.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments