Jury in 'roadside sex' libel case fails to agree
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE JURY in the libel action brought by Gillian Taylforth, the EastEnders actress, against the Sun newspaper failed to agree a verdict yesterday and will resume its discussions today, writes Will Bennett.
After four hours of debate, the eight men and four women were told by the judge, Mr Justice Drake, that he would allow a majority verdict of at least 10-2.
Miss Taylforth and her fiance Geoff Knights, both 38, of Highbury New Park, north London, are suing the Sun over an article which alleged that they had indulged in a 'sex romp' in their Range Rover on a slip road of the A1 in Hertfordshire. The newspaper denies libel.
The couple deny that they were having oral sex when a police officer stopped by their vehicle. They say that Mr Knights suffers from pancreatitis and that Miss Taylforth was massaging his stomach because he was feeling sick.
In his summing up yesterday, Mr Justice Drake said: 'There is a complete dispute on evidence as to whether the policeman did or did not see an indecent act . . .
'He says he did. The plaintiffs say he didn't. There is really no room for a mistake there. Someone simply blatantly isn't telling the truth.'
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments