Judge orders emergency hearing for detainee
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A HIGH COURT judge yesterday ordered an emergency hearing to be held over the Christmas holiday to explain why a hospital had continued to detain a woman after a Mental Health Review Tribunal decided she should be freed.
The woman, who lives alone with her four children in a council flat, had hoped to be released in time to spend Christmas at home.
Mr Justice Potts ordered the psychiatrist and hospital to prepare papers for the woman's lawyers by 5pm on Christmas Eve. He said personal liberty was the overriding consideration. 'There will be a vacation judge sitting throughout Christmas and the new year. There will be a full hearing on Monday next.'
His clerk pointed out that 28 December was a bank holiday. The judge said the case should still go ahead that day, or the following day at the latest.
Eleanor Mulcohy, 39, was detained for 28 days at South Western hospital in Clapham, south London, on 21 November under Section 2 of the Mental Health Act after she lit a fire in her home. The order was signed by a psychiatrist, a general practitioner and a social worker. She appealed to the tribunal, which ruled last Monday that she should be released three days later.
But the psychiatrist immediately had her detained for a further six months under a different part, Section 3, of the Mental Health Act. Yesterday Fenella Morris, counsel for Miss Mulcohy, applied to the High Court for a writ of habeas corpus, the right not to be imprisoned without trial, on the grounds that the correct redress in law, the tribunal, had been disregarded.
Richard Gordon, for the twin respondents, the psychiatrist Dr R E Lawrence and the Mental Health Act managers of the hospital, said there was no issue to try. The managers had acted under parallel powers after the tribunal's ruling. Mr Gordon said the psychiatrist's report, agreed by a GP and a social worker, showed the woman had suffered from long-standing hypermania.
After the case, Ms Morris said the tribunal had decided the mental illness was not 'of a nature and degree' for detention to be necessary.
It had decided Miss Mulcohy was willing to take medication as an outpatient, that she had the support of friends and relatives, and that she posed no risk to herself, her children, or to others.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments