Judge lifts reporting ban on Levitt case rebuke
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.THE JUDGE criticised for the light sentence he gave to Roger Levitt, the life insurance salesman who admitted fraud, yesterday lifted a reporting ban on the severe rebuke he had given Levitt's defence counsel, writes Paul Durman.
Levitt was sentenced to 180 hours' community service last week after he admitted lying to City authorities. This was only a small part of a much larger case, in which Levitt was accused of theft and fraud involving millions of pounds. Levitt denied these charges.
The lifting of the reporting ban sheds light on the Serious Fraud Office's willingness to accept a guilty plea to a lesser charge, after the opening statement by Jonathan Goldberg QC, Levitt's counsel.
Mr Justice Laws, the trial judge, yesterday granted an application from the SFO to allow reports of Mr Goldberg's statement and the criticism that followed it.
Mr Goldberg told the jury that Levitt had injected pounds 22m of his own money, 'honestly come by', into his ailing firm. The judge severely criticised Mr Goldberg in the absence of the jury for 'subverting' an earlier ruling to deal neutrally with the cash injection.
Sir Nicholas Lyell, the Attorney- General, said last night that he had investigated the conduct of the case against Levitt and was satisfied that 'the prosecution by the Serious Fraud Office was fairly, properly and vigorously conducted'.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments