Judge attacks 'no jail' ruling in indecent assault cases
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A senior Crown Court judge yesterday criticised Court of Appeal rulings that allowed men who indecently assaulted women to avoid a custodial sentence.
Jailing Scott Townsend for a 'richly deserved' six months for rubbing himself against a female Tube train passenger, Judge Gerald Butler QC said at Southwark Crown Court that he would have run the risk of 'public anger' if he had not passed a jail sentence on the defendant.
The judge then called on the High Court to 'consider the matter afresh', as offences of this kind were now 'so prevalent'. Townsend, 22, who had another six months added to his sentence for intimidating female jurors who tried him, had denied simulating intercourse with the female passenger on a crowded rush-hour Victoria line train last March.
He was seen committing the offence by four plain-clothes police officers in the same carriage.
Before passing sentence, Judge Butler, Southwark's senior judge, mentioned recent Court of Appeal rulings that declared it was wrong in principle that men who committed this type of offence should be jailed. A community service order or a fine with a compensation in costs order was the proper approach.
The appeal court's decision followed the referral of two cases where men had 'ground' against women on the same Tube line.
David Marshall, for Townsend, argued that in the view of the legal authorities his client should not be jailed, although he conceded some people might find the appeal court's approach 'surprising, if not astonishing'.
Judge Butler said: 'I would agree with your remarks.' Although bound by the rulings, he felt that after 'giving a great deal of thought to this matter', that he could make a distinction between Townsend and the two men who featured in the cases before the Court of Appeal. Townsend, of Camberwell, south-east London, who denied indecent assault, had 'numerous' previous convictions, although none were of a sexual nature.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments