Journalists question ruling on secret trial
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.The Court of Appeal yesterday gave its ruling on a challenge by two journalists against a criminal trial which was held entirely in secret. But the judgment of the Lord Chief Justice, Lord Peter Taylor, was also given in secret.
It is now not known why such an unprecedented course in an English criminal trial was adopted, or whether the journalists were successful with their challenge.
At the start of the appeal Tim Crook and Caroline Godwin, who work at the Old Bailey, asked that their outline arguments of the principles involved be given in open court along with the judgment. The request was refused.
The two agreed to the confidentiality of the proceedings in order to be able to make oral submissions against a Crown Court's original decision.
Afterwards they said: 'We feel this whole episode brings the legal system into disrepute and far from encouraging public confidence, undermines it profoundly. It is a bizarre sequence of events and we do not believe the judges have properly considered the paramount importance of open justice.'
They are considering taking the case to the European Court of Human Rights.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments