James Cleverly insists new treaty with Rwanda fixes all legal concerns
The Home Secretary signed the legally-binding deal in Kigali on Tuesday.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.James Cleverly has insisted his new legally-binding treaty with Rwanda addresses all of the reasons that caused the Supreme Court to deem the Governmentās flagship asylum policy unlawful.
The Home Secretary said he ācannot see any credible reasonā to question the nation now after he signed the deal in Kigali, where he hopes the first migrant flights will land in the spring.
Mr Cleverly said categorically at a post-signing press conference on Tuesday that the UK has not paid any more money to Rwanda in addition to the Ā£140 million already handed over.
But he signalled that there will āinevitablyā be further costs to cover the new burdens imposed on the Rwandan legal system.
āOf course, when a country is taking on responsibilities as Rwanda is doing, it is right and proper that there is remuneration to reflect the additional costs that they are bringing on,ā Mr Cleverly said.
The Home Secretary promised that āemergencyā legislation will come before Parliament āsoonā to determine that Rwanda is a safe destination, under the second tier of the Governmentās approach.
But he could not guarantee that the first group of asylum seekers who arrive in the UK on small boats would be sent to Kigali on a one-way ticket in the coming months.
Instead, he told reporters: āWe want to see this part of our wider migration plan up and running as quickly as possible.
āWe feel very strongly that this treaty addresses all of the issues raised by their lordships in the Supreme Court and we have worked very closely with our Rwandan partners to ensure that it does so.ā
He said he ācannot see any credible reasonā to question Rwandaās track record, adding: āI really hope that we can now move quickly.ā
On November 15, the UKās top court blocked the policy over concerns that genuine refugees could be wrongly sent back to their countries of origin where they would face persecution.
In an attempt to rectify this, the new treaty means British and Commonwealth judges will preside over a newly-established appeals process within Rwandaās high court for exceptional cases.
Another key measure is a commitment that no-one will be removed by Rwanda to any other country other than to the UK.
Experts from the UK will also be seconded to Rwanda to assist with the processing of asylum decisions.
People sent to Rwanda will have free legal assistance funded by the taxpayer throughout the process.
Mr Cleverly said no new money was directly connected to the document following disputed reports of a Ā£15 million top-up payment, but did not rule out additional costs in the future.
āLet me make it clear. The Rwandan government has not asked for and we have not provided any funding linked to the signing of this treaty,ā he said.
āThe financial arrangement which inevitably comes as part of an international agreement reflects the costs that may be imposed on Rwanda through the changes that this partnership has created in their systems, in their legal systems and their institutions.ā
After signing the deal with Mr Cleverly, Rwandaās foreign affairs minister Vincent Biruta expressed his frustration at the judgment by some of the UKās top justices.
He suggested āinternal UK politicsā may have played a role and said his country has been āunfairly treatedā by the courts, international organisations and the media.
But he committed to improving the Rwandan asylum system so it is āfair and transparentā.
The Law Society of England and Wales was sceptical, saying it āremains unclearā how the treaty will overcome the Supreme Court ruling based on a āwell-established principle of international lawā.
Nick Emmerson, the president of the professional association representing solicitors, argued that neither the deal nor new legislation ācan overnight provide adequate means of safeguarding the rights of people removed to Rwandaā.
Prime Minister Rishi Sunak met Rwandaās president Paul Kagame on the sidelines of the Cop28 climate talks in Dubai on Friday as part of the push to finalise the deal.
Mr Cleverly is the third home secretary to travel to Rwanda since Priti Patel signed the initial deal last April. His predecessor, Suella Braverman, visited Kigali earlier this year.
But so far no asylum seekers have been sent to the country due to the hard-fought legal battles.
Labourās Yvette Cooper said āmore home secretaries than asylum seekers have been sent there and the scheme is badly failingā.
The shadow home secretary added: āAlready the Government has given Rwanda more than Ā£140 million and they are refusing to come clean on how much in total this is costing or how they will ever make it work.
āAll we know is that even if it ever does get off the ground, it will only cover a very small number of people when over 1,000 people arrived in small boats last week alone. This is just more Tory asylum chaos.ā