Is bridge a sport? High Court judge to rule on whether or not card game is a 'mind sport'
Officials say recognition will have "beneficial consequences" for card game
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.A High Court judge has been asked to decide whether bridge is a sport.
Mr Justice Dove is expected to analyse argument over the next two days at a High Court hearing in London.
The English Union (EBU) took legal action after Sport England refused to recognise the card game as a sport.
Union officials say recognition that bridge is a sport will have "beneficial consequences" for the game.
"Sport England refused to recognise bridge as a sport, a position which the EBU believes to be inconsistent with both the wishes of Parliament, and the opinion of significant international sporting organisations," said an EBU spokesman.
"When ruling on what constituted a sport in the 2011 Charities Act, Parliament specifically included 'mind sports', stating that sport comprised 'activities which promote health involving physical or mental skill or exertion'."
He said bridge required "undoubted levels of mental skill" and had "known health benefits".
Lawyers for the EBU said officials want a judicial review to "determine" whether Sport England, the government body which distributes lottery funding, had acted lawfully in "adopting a policy that prevents it recognising sports that it does not consider to be 'physical'."
"The EBU is hoping that the judicial review will pave the way for bridge and similar sports to receive the recognition that they deserve," said a spokesman for law firm Irwin Mitchell, which is representing the EBU.
Recognition by Sport England is important because lack of recognition impacts upon EBU's ability to take part in European and international competitions.
He added: "Chess has already been recognised as a sport by the International Olympic Committee and was demonstrated at the Sydney Olympics in 2000. It was also included in the 2006 and 2010 Asian Games and is being considered for the Pan-American games.
"Organisers of the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo have invited both chess and bridge to apply for inclusion in the games, which, if accepted, will be the first time players have competed in the Olympics.
"If bridge were to be recognised as a sport in England then EBU would be able to invest in a number of projects to teach Bridge to people of all ages and to ensure that facilities are improved."
Lawyer Alex Peebles went on: "We will argue that a sport does not need to be physical to be regarded as a sport as a matter of law. We hope our legal challenge will result in Sport England reconsidering its decision not to recognise bridge as a sport, which will help the EBU to access the essential support they need to continue growing and attracting new players."
And Jeremy Dhondy, an international bridge player and chairman of the EBU, said: "We hope that this hearing will allow bridge to be recognised in the way that it should."
Press Association
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments