Insurance firms face cash penalty
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Insurance companies that delay compensation cases coming to court face punitive interest payments on top of awards made by courts, under proposals for changing the law being considered by Lord Justice Woolf, writes Stephen Ward.
Lord Woolf, who is halfway through a review of civil justice for the Lord Chancellor, welcomed yesterday's guidelines from Lord Taylor, but said his proposals would go further. Lord Taylor's guidelines use existing rules and laws, while Lord Woolf will recommend reforms which need new legislation.
During consultations with the profession, he has suggested that it would be fair for a defendant in a damages action who has unreasonably refused to settle to have to pay interest from that time. "We want to encourage people to settle," he said. "I wouldsuggest the rate of interest should be 6 per cent above the rate in force.''
It would be for a judge to decide what was unreasonable. He has also proposed giving judges the power to award costs of up to 100 per cent extra against either side where they have unduly prolonged a case.
Lord Woolf is due to write his preliminary report in the spring, and a final report next year.
Like Lord Taylor, he believes the ethos of the courts has to change. He is expected to recommend changes to the role of judges, to give them greater involvement in planning and managing cases. He has visited France and concluded the inquisitorial system there is cheaper and quicker, although no better in producing justice.
Specifically he thinks a single expert witness could answer to the court, rather than having two competing. He is also considering recommending making it mandatory for some cases to be referred to arbitration or some other non-judicial process before using the more expensive machinery of a court.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments