Inspectors reject rise in teaching hours
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SCHOOL inspectors have rebuffed John Patten, the Secretary of State for Education, saying that the length of the school week makes no difference to the standard of work achieved by pupils.
Mr Patten had suggested that more teaching hours would raise standards and asked for a report on how the length of the school week correlated with the quality of pupils' work.
Ofsted, the schools inspectors, said in a report published yesterday that there was no clear relationship between pupil achievement and teaching time. And there was only a 'weak' association between taught time and test and examination results.
The inspectors said schools with a shorter week may not be covering the national curriculum adequately and longer hours would allow for greater coverage of core subjects. However, the quality of education would not necessarily be improved. The evidence 'does not justify increasing the recommended minimum hours of taught time in schools', they said.
The inspectors found that at primary level, schools with more teaching time gave greater attention to reading, English, and mathematics, as well as to links between subjects. In secondary schools, there was more time for a broader curriculum, such as three separate science subjects, or a second foreign language, or promotion of links with industry.
The report said that the total time pupils spent in school each week varied by 4.1 hours in primaries and by 8 hours in secondaries. In the latter, taught time ranged from 22.5 hours to 26.7 for 11- to 16-year-olds.
More than 80 per cent of schools had increased the length of the taught week since the introduction of the national curriculum in 1989.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments