Inquiry into 'unlawful' lottery grant to opera house
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MARIANNE MACDONALD
Arts Reporter
The National Audit Office is investigating a complaint that the pounds 55m lottery grant given to the Royal Opera House by the Arts Council was unlawful, as the council is a trustee of its land. The complaint also claims the Royal Opera House would be in breach of lottery law if it used the pounds 55m to pay for a proposed shopping development on its Covent Garden site.
The ROH lottery application asked for money for a pounds 213m scheme to redevelop the Grade I listed opera house in Covent Garden. It said it would raise extra funding through donations and by building shops to sell at a pounds 65m profit.
But the NAO complaint claims the Arts Council should not have given the ROH cash, as directions under the Lottery Act forbid it to fund a company of which it is "a member".
It argues the Arts Council is a "member" of the ROH because the redevelopment work will be carried out by a subsidiary company of the Royal Opera House Development Land Trust, of which the Arts Council is a trustee. Gouldens, solicitors acting for the Covent Garden Community Association, a local residents' group, said the award represented a "plain conflict of interest". It told Jeremy Newton, the national lottery director, that the Covent Garden site is held under a trust deed which specifies that the proceeds from any sale of its land are to be split between the Arts Council and the ROH: "Any money distributed by the Arts Council to the Royal Opera House for the development of the site will be money distributed for the benefit of the Arts Council itself."
A spokeswoman for the funding body said the ROH assessment report would not be made public because it was too"sensitive".
Mr Newton denied the funding body was guilty of illegality. He said the pounds 55m would not be used to pay for the shops but for the opera house extension.
He denied the Arts Council was a "member" of Royal Opera House Developments Ltd. "We are not a shareholder in the company," he said. "We have had legal opinion from two law firms and a QC that we have a cast-iron case." A spokeswoman for the Royal Opera House said that the Arts Council had been appointed joint trustee of its land to protect the public interest.
The complaint was filed by Denis Vaughan, the conductor and director of the new Council for the Advancement of Arts, Recreation and Education. Fiendish saga, page 2
Subscribe to Independent Premium to bookmark this article
Want to bookmark your favourite articles and stories to read or reference later? Start your Independent Premium subscription today.
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments