Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Inner cities 'face choice of gun law or regeneration': The Institute of Geographers' Conference

Stan Abbott
Wednesday 06 January 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE Government faces a stark choice between European examples of self-confident cities emerging from the difficulties of changing economic circumstances and the gun law of the ghetto typical of downtown America.

This was the warning of Professor Brian Robson of Manchester University - a government adviser on urban policy - in his presidential address to the annual conference of the Institute of British Geographers at Royal Holloway College, London.

His warning was given greater poignancy by the shooting in Moss Side, Manchester, at the weekend. Professor Robson castigated the consistent failure of government to invest enough money in its urban policy or to achieve any long-term coherent policy towards cities.

Yet a decade of his and others' research at Liverpool University suggested that where government funds were targeted on cities, real benefits could be achieved, as had been the case in the 57 urban priority areas. For example, the unemployment gap between assisted and non-assisted areas had narrowed over the last 10 years.

The Government's claims to be spending pounds 4bn annually on urban policy were 'not far short of the mark', he said, and his findings suggested that urban policy 'had done more than merely provide a political sop to the demand of recognising the plight of cities'.

But he said the Government had in effect 'put up the shutters' after the Autumn Statement, with the stopping of new commitments under the Urban Programme, the end of City Challenge and the renegotiation of Urban Development Corporation budgets. In their place the only new money was the Department of the Environment's Capital Partnership, worth just pounds 20m.

'Segregation of poor and disadvantaged people into ghettos guarded by armed police, or better off neighbours hiring their own armed guards may sound like the stuff of a John Carpenter film, but could be a realistic end- product if there is continued failure to address the problems faced by too many people in our cities.'

It was not enough, he said, to rely on benefits 'trickling down' from large developments such as the London Docklands. 'When too many inhabitants of a city are without money, without work, without homes and, worst of all, without hope, then cities as entities must inevitably flounder.'

Professor Robson said Britain should find inspiration in the success of northern European cities, such as Hamburg, Paris and Amsterdam and not regard the north American experience of depopulation and decline as inevitable.

(Photograph omitted)

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in