Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Ice-creams at tourist spots fail to lick hygiene tests

David Nicholson-Lord
Monday 09 May 1994 23:02 BST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

NEARLY half a sample of ice- creams bought near tourist attractions in London, Rome and Barcelona failed UK hygiene tests because of contamination by bacteria, according to Holiday Which? magazine, published today, writes David Nicholson-Lord.

A survey found dirty scoops, grubby freezers and people serving food without washing their hands or covering their hair.

Patricia Yates, editor of Holiday Which?, said many vendors were 'clearly ignoring the regulations'. The European Commission suspects microbial contamination is 'rife' in ice-creams.

Of 60 vanilla ice-creams tested, 26 contravened the UK code of hygiene practice: in London six of 20 samples failed. One ice-cream, bought near the British Museum, was 'loaded' with coliform bacteria and was rated 'very poor' by inspectors, who noted a dirty freezer littered with food scraps.

In Barcelona, 9 out of 20 samples failed the test and 1 in 3 was rated very poor; in Rome, where inspectors saw a man urinate against a wall and return to his van without washing his hands, 11 out of 20 samples failed and listeria was found in one.

The magazine advises consumers to look for signs of poor hygiene - flies or rubbish, staff who smoke or have dirty clothes and scoops left in cloudy water.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in