HS2: Investing in smaller transport schemes will not solve ‘core issue’ – expert
The former boss of the Strategic Rail Authority said what has been announced ‘doesn’t address’ the main problem.
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Scrapping HS2 north of Birmingham to invest in alternative transport projects will not solve the “fundamental problem with our rail network”, according to an industry expert.
Richard Bowker, the former boss of the Strategic Rail Authority, said it was “hard to argue” the schemes listed by Rishi Sunak were “not good ideas”, but he warned they “don’t solve the core problem”.
He told the PA news agency: “The fundamental problem with our rail network in and around the major conurbations is that there are real capacity constraints largely driven by having lots of different kinds of trains on the same lines.
“That’s quite inefficient.
“The point about HS2 was that it was transformational, it was a game-changer, it got the fast stuff off the existing network and allowed it to breathe.
“It allowed it to have more of those other trains on it, whether they’re local, regional or freight.
“What’s been announced today doesn’t address that problem.”
He added: “If we’re not careful, all we’ll end up with is some probably quite good projects.
“They still all need to be planned, they still all need to be costed.
“Really, they’re dealing with things at the edge. They don’t solve that core issue.”
Sir John Armitt, who chairs the National Infrastructure Commission, said: “HS2 was part of a long-term strategy with clear objectives to link up some of the country’s largest cities.
“It had been planned for almost 15 years and under construction since 2017.
“The decision to stop the legs north and east of Birmingham is deeply disappointing, leaving a major gap in the UK’s rail strategy around which a number of city regions have been basing their economic growth plans.
“While it is welcome that the money will be redirected into rail and other transport projects for the North and Midlands, it’s not yet clear how the collection of schemes announced today will address the gap left behind by HS2.”