Stay up to date with notifications from The Independent

Notifications can be managed in browser preferences.

Howard tries softer line on prison staff

Heather Mills,Home Affairs Correspondent
Saturday 20 November 1993 00:02 GMT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

THE GOVERNMENT yesterday sought to back away from a High Court ruling effectively banning the Prison Officers' Association as a trade union, writes Heather Mills.

In a successful attempt to stop next week's industrial action over prison privatisation, ministers had won a temporary ruling that officers shared the same status as police - and therefore had no right to strike.

But in recognition of the fact that the ruling destroyed the POA as a union, Michael Howard, the Home Secretary, sought to diffuse the situation by saying he wanted it to continue negotiating pay and conditions. He also offered staff access to industrial tribunals for the first time in the union's 54-year history.

The POA said yesterday that Mr Howard was seeking to 'disentangle himself from a complicated mess of his own making'.

Terry McLaren, of the union's national executive committee, said: 'Mr Howard cannot have it both ways. How can he offer us rights to an industrial tribunal, which would recognise us as workers, while at the same time argue that we share the same status as police?'

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in